Gigi Hadid and Beverly Hills Mansion
According to The Telegraph and celebrity reporter Nick Allen (The Telegraph•November 23, 2019) a judge ordered the mansion built by Gigi Hadid's father torn down because as her daddy said it was a "witch hunt"
I dont know much about this particular instance but I know property developers hire contractors who create the architectural designs and submit plans to the city for review and to issue a permit for construction, then city inspectors review the construction to make sure it adheres to the approved plans that were issued a permit.
So when things go south, the people in court who get sued are the architectural firm, the engineers and inspectors, it's never the property developer - UNLESS THE PROPERTY DEVELOPER DECIDED TO PLAY ENGINEER AND OVERRIDE THE SPECIALISTS' expertise but that never happens - the reason a developer hires these people is to guard against these liabilities. So why Mr. Hadid is being held liable and not the construction company and the city inspectors? He should be suing the city inspectors for lapses in performing their municipal obligations and duties under the city charter.